It is becoming more and more clear there is some kind of master elite running the show so to speak. Who are these people behind the wars, and military agendas, behind governments and the big corporations? How can we draw the lines and find names, dates, when and where exactly this began? Some people say "they." "They" control the media, "they" control the governments, "they" control the money, "they" even control the weather. Well who then, are "they"?
I never thought 20 years out of highschool I would be interested in revisiting such (at the time) dry history topics as the war of 1812, Napoleons invasion of France, the Louisiana Purchase, the Battle of Waterloo, or the Federal Reserve Act. These were so ingrained in me as something I needed to know absolutely nothing about that I left them sitting on a dusty shelf for decades never again questioning their true implications.
Many are becoming aware that there truly is a global elite, a shadow government, and that they are the true power of the world pulling all the strings. They have names and a history behind them. Otherwise they will remain in the land of speculation and conspiracy theory, and as they have stayed there in those shadows over the past two centuries, this has benefited their operation. Knowledge is power.
I would like to map this out for you in a brief overview, how our financial world (otherwise known as the world) was taken over in a little over a century by a group of unscrupulous entitled men. I will also look to highlight their agenda which has been making progress for 200 years. Though this agenda goes back thousands of years we will start here.
We begin with the introduction of Mayer Amschel (Rothschild) which he changed his name to after branding his business with a red shield, the symbol of radical Jews in Europe at the time. The name "Rothschild" literally means "red shield" in German. After working as a financer and goldsmith for many years he began to work for the Bank of Hanover controlled by the Oppenhiemers. There he excelled to become a junior partner.
In 1769 Mayer Amschel Rothschild became an agent for Prince William IX making him an intermediary for the biggest Frankfurt banks. After Prince William IX father died he was given his fathers great fortune, which was the largest accumulation of wealth in Europe at the time. As Napoleon's troops pushed forward in 1806 Prince William left his wealth in the care of Mayer Rothschild (the equivalent of around 3 million dollars.) Mayer Rothschild buried the records which kept receipt of debtors and interest they were required to pay to avoid Napoleon from commandeering the fortune.
The Rothschild's decided to defeat Napoleon (who appointed himself King of France in 1804) and threatened their banking system when he offered interest free loans to France. They decided this must be stopped, not by troops and armies, but through financial dominance. Napoleon's war was financed through the Rothschild's (who also funded the opposing sides.) Since Napoleon needed so much money to fund his war he agreed to selling off French territory in America through the Louisiana Purchase of 1804.
Though Mayer Rothschild died in 1812 in Frankfurt Germany, he was succeeded by his five sons which continued the families banking empire.
The Battle of Waterloo in 1815 sealed the Rothschild families self-designed fate to overtake complete control of European finances. How did they do it? During the battle it initially appeared Napoleon was winning which was reported to London, yet as reinforcements arrived from Prussia the momentum was reversed. The Rothschild's had an insider at the battle who expediently informed them of the true outcome, opposite the news that had reached London and a full 24 hours prior to anyone elses knowledge. (Though they already had sculpted the victor through economics.) The Rothschilds profited greatly from this, since everyone believed that Napoleon had won, the Rothschild's played on this and sold all their stock on the English Market. Everyone else began to follow suit and the stocks plummeted to virtually nothing. At the last minute Rothschild had his agents buy up all the stock at the discounted price. When news of the true victors of Wellington reached the war office, the Rothschild's already had complete control of the British economy as they owned the majority of the now high valued British Bonds. Clever guys, I'll give them that. Didn't care at all who they hurt (which remains true 200 years later), but true bankers.
Enter the creation of the Bank of New England which was in the control of non other than Nathan Rothschild. Along with the money Nathan generated through using Prince Williams money on a gold scheme in East India, this became the vast fortune of the Rothschild legend.
This trend continued with similarly calculated and cold precision. As France tried to reestablish itself in 1817 and the Rothschild family (Mayer's five sons) seized this opportunity. They began buying massive amounts of French government bonds, which increased their value drastically. Only to dispose of them in the open market a month later causing the bonds to lose value and creating a financial disaster which only they themselves could be called upon to salvage. By the end of this scheme, the Rothschild bankers had control of France. They now had banks set up in Germany, England and France and were well on their well to the international domination they desired.
Mayer Amschel Rothschild was famously quoted as saying "Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws."
The five Rothschild sons spread out across Europe, this is symbolized today on the family crest with the five arrows. They reached Vienna, Paris, Naples, London and Frankfurt setting up banks there. The Rothschild household was worth 300 million by this time. They began investing in Railroads, Steel Industry, even began delving into oil interests in Russia and Africa. They financed Russian Czar's and the diamond monopoly. They funded France to form an empire in Africa. They financed the Vatican as well through Hapsburg Monarchs to save them from bankruptcy. In America men like JD Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie (Oil and Steel industries) were also excelled at the hands of the Rothschild blessing.
During the 1820's it became clear that the Rothschild's were the true power of Europe with the ability to bless of curse an entire nation. By 1913 the family treasury was valued at a staggering 2 billion dollars (this is an incredible amount of money at the time, even today it is quite alot).
What's so bad about creating wealth, helping boost economies, and having your own ideas about who to fund? Well the Rothschild's took a special interest in financing governments specifically, lending to governments and funding both sides of wars. For instance during the Napoleonic Wars one son funded Napoleon and another funded Great Britain, Germany etc. In this way they alone could chose the victor by funding one side a bit more, and even benefiting off of this by funding the side who would lose just enough to further indebt them. In fact every major war since has both been manufactured to generate profit and funded (again on both sides) by this small group of careless men (though the banks now have more branches, not all of them operating under the Rothschilds name).
In 1694 "The City" was formed covering roughly just under one square mile on the northern banks of the Thames River. This is the center of Britain's national affairs. With the cabinet, parliament and prime minister only acting as a façade (much like our president does in the United States.) This "city" has been given special rights and privileges and operates as a sovereign state (like the Vatican or Washington DC). It is independent of outside rule. These guys don't answer to our laws, or anyone else's. This was the destined home of those as unscrupulous as the Rothschild's.
How did this group of bankers, who swiftly gained control of the world financially, influence every war proceeding the Napoleonic wars? What exactly is the New World Order? Is 9/11 somehow connected to all of this? Was 9/11 not the first, but one of many engineered provocations to introduce the motivation to wage profitable (to the bankers) war? Who do our governments, our seeming independent corporations, and the media answer to? What is the Federal Reserve and the Bank of International Settlements? The answer to each of these can be linked in one word; money.
John F. Kennedy's speech called "President and the Press" given on April 27, 1961;
".. there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment...
...Today no war has been declared—and however fierce the struggle may be—it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.
If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of "clear and present danger," then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.
It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions—by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence—on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.
Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security—and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion...That question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the Nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration...
...I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.
I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers—I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for, as a wise man once said: "An error doesn't become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.
Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed—and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian law-maker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment—the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution—not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"—but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.
This means greater coverage and analysis of international news—for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security—and we intend to do it...
...And so it is to the printing press—to the recorder of man's deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news—that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent." JFK assassinated on November 22, 1963.
Two American presidents in history were (successfully) assassinated; Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. Both had one thing in common, they wished to object or put an end to the Federal Reserve Banking system. This obstruction was avoided when the Federal Reserve act was passed in 1913 while most of congress was home for Christmas. This act was signed by President Wilson in exchange for campaign contributions. This unethical and unconstitutional model was followed by many politicians over the next century. This gave the private owned international bank the ability to print paper as money which it loaned to the government at interest to be payed back over time (like an IOU). Governments would then use their own citizens, taxpayers, as collateral. That is what our birth certificate is, it is an agreement staking out very lives to the collateral (property to be secured against a loan) of our government. The primary members of this group were J P Morgan, J D Rockefeller, Jacob Schiff, and Paul and Max Warburg (daddy Warbucks.) All of these men were associated with and backed by non other than the central bankers of the world; the Rothschild's.
The Rothschild's have used their influence to control who is placed in power over entire nations, what wars are waged and the direction of each war since the 1800's. What is the agenda? A One world government, not the happy peaceful we-are-one philosophy of the 60's but an enforced one world order with an elite ruling over the entire world.
Lets take a look at the progress made toward this goal. After the Napoleonic wars there was an initiative to form a federation, Switzerland was declared as a neutral territory that member kingdoms could use to deposit their money. The Bank of International Settlements was used during WW1 and WW2 for this purpose. At this point many nations affected by these wars were heavily indebted to the Rothschild's. The congress of Vienna was held to push the federation agenda which was opposed by the Russian Czar as he saw it as a movement toward a New World Order takeover. (If I am loosing you to the more tedious history here, please understand, these vital pieces each connect and it gets really interesting, I promise.)
If we backtrack a bit to look at Columbus (who did not discover America, as the Vikings had made their way there centuries prior) who was sent to America to begin to establish a New World Order. This was always meant to be the function of America. He was funded by the same elite's who pushed this thousand years old agenda of Masonic and Illuminati origin. If you take a look at the United States Presidents, Bankers, and influential leaders, many were high ranking Free Mason's. Freemasonry is a filtering of many ancient occult religions (egyptian, druid) and the Knights Templar, understand that any morality typically involved in religion in devoid at this level. The masonic symbolism is blatantly reflected on our money itself, the all seeing eye (of Horus)above the pyramid, and below it the "Novus Ordo Seclorum" which in Latin means "New order of the ages" or New World Order. This agenda has been in place since inception. Look at more links to the freemason history of the US (http://theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/uspresidentasmasons.htm)
The American Revolution was an effort to reflect the financially based government of France in America. And in 1791 Alexander Hamilton was the first to establish a privately owned central bank in the United States on a 20 year charter. The theory was 10 million in stock would be placed for sale of which the US government would buy 2 million. Since the US government (at the time) did not have 2 million the government would purchase the stock through loans from the bank to be paid back in installments. This was a system of credit. One of the terms of this was that the Bank were to remain privately owned. This action was contrary to the constitution which Hamilton himself had signed. When the Charter expired in 1811 non other than Nathan Rothschild made threat that "Either the application for renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itself in the most disastrous war."
This promise was kept in one way or another. America repelled the British during the war of 1812 since the British troops were tied up fighting Napoleon and could not send reinforcements. While America "won" a military battle, it became financially crippled. This forced a re-chartering of the private Bank of the United States. On top of this blow, due to debt and inflation the national debt rose to an explosive 127 million dollars (a lot of money today and an unthinkable amount then, again at a time when the US government did not even have 2 million).
Andrew Jackson vetoed the bank in 1832 and in 1835 distributed a 35 million dollar surplus which was the only time in history the America "balanced" it's books. The Rothschild's had their minds set to reclaim America financially. This is when we begin to see a "divide and conquer" strategy implemented, and the conflict which was played upon divided the north and south resulted in the American Civil War. The north was set to be a British colony under Lionel Rothschild annex to Canada. And the south to be a French colony under the control of James Rothschild. Abraham Lincoln while fighting to outlaw slavery had the high responsibility to find funding which could pay for the defense of America (against the international bankers wrought to destroy it).
Lincoln's solution did not agree with these international bankers, as he developed the "Greenback" an interest free currency that would be redeemable later in gold. On April 14th, 1865, five days after the south surrendered Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth (a member of the knights of the golden circle, aka the masonic KGC.) The agenda of the KGC was a "golden circle" Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean, and the southern states which would officially sanction slavery. Offshoots of this were the notorious KKK. Albert Pike a sovereign commander of Scottish freemasonry in New York was asked by the American freemasons to reform their rites and rituals. He did so by writing a text known as "Morals and Dogma" which gave way to the formation of the KGC. Pike created his own office as Chief Justice of the KKK. This mentality was responsible for fueling the racial tensions which sparked the American Civil War (which is what the Rothschild's had threatened.) You can see now the links to the true motivation of this war, it was about who would control the money of the United States, and fueled by those who wished to do so. You can also likely appreciate the suffering this caused, and the immorality of the methods.
You can begin to see how we were being attacked from many angles by different arms of the same larger body. Each linked to the Masons and international bankers for a global agenda.
We will skip ahead for a moment to discuss the Round Table group which is composed of five main organizations including; The Counsel on Foreign Relations, the United Nations, the Bilderberg Group, the Royal Institute for International Affairs, and the Trilateral Commission. These are the most influential and interconnected groups in the World, each working together toward a common goal. Their agenda and relations were outlined in a work done by Georgetown University Professor Carol Quigley who warned then president Bill Clinton. "The Power of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole."
How did these influential and unscrupulous few indoctrinate the elected officials with their agenda? Through secret societies, special memebers get special rights and priveledges, anyone with questionable moral judgements might be lured by such a deal. Especially when confronted with the power of those involved and the inevitable fact that remaining on the outside (so to speak) is a costly rightousness to observe. One such society is Skull and Bones founded at Yale by William Huntington Russell who made quite a bit of money through the India and China Opium trade (which began from Britain, at the behest of the Queen, occupying India and attacking China years prior to corner and monopolize the profitable and devastating opium market). I think it is noteworthy to share the interconnections of both Rothschild's and freemasonry with British royalty. (see more on this; http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Arnold.Leese/Gentile.Folly_The.Rothschilds/08.The.Rothschilds.and.British.Royalty.htm)
Russell was looking for a way to protect his vast assets from taxation by establishing a tax free foundation. This establishment called "Russell Trust" formed an institution called Skull and Bones in 1832 which became a freemason blacklodge. Three generations of the Bush's were members of this society. Prescott, George H. and George W. Bush. In fact both John Kerry and George W. Bush were members and in this way, it truly made no difference who "won" that election. "They" had it in the bag.
Now we can move back again to fill in some gaps, WW1 and WW2, what dark underwritten purpose did those terrible conflicts serve? The Hegelian Dialectic is a formula for achieving the goals of a Illuminati (freemason) One World Order. This was developed by German born Georg Hegel. This is a very simple system and has been successfully used many times over the past century. Three steps are involved. 1; a government will create a problem, even through harming its own citizens. This is what we have seen with false flag attacks which have been used many times before 9/11. 2; the government will control the reaction to the problem it created by offering a source of blame. An enemy or an aspect of society over which it seeks to gain more control. 3; the government will offer a solution, which was the point of the agenda. This solution is typically a war or a system of regulations. This solution is generally not a desirable one, except for the fact that the government created a problem which now needs to be dealt with. At least that is the perspective of the masses who now urge for these initiatives in the name of security depending on how said government handled step 2. In this way a series of problems, reactions and solutions can lead the way to a specific goal. Every major 20th and 21st century war was manufactured using the fundamentals of the Hegelian Dialectic.
Karl Marx a 32nd degree mason wrote many books about economics and his influence was vast. He was trained by German Philosopher Fredrich Engles. Engles had joined a revolutionary group a decade prior which was founded by Mafia leader and Freemason Giuseppe Mazzini. Marx went on to write The Communist Manifesto which was published in 1848. This work was based off of Engles works. The foundations of communism and the illuminati agenda are identical. Nathan Rothschild funded Karl Marx to finance and endorse the cause of socialism. Though Marx wrote about the working class overthrowing the elites in Das Kapital, it seems he did not practice what he had preached.
This sets the stage for Vladamir (Nikolai) Lenin who also became a mason while attending University. Meanwhile in America the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was being passed giving the private international bankers control of America's finances once and for all. Now the pieces are in place to begin World War One. (This is chess, not checkers.)
The bankers of Europe and America saw an opportunity through antagonizing the growing tension between Germany and America to insert the economic and social domination of Europe. The torpedoing of HMS Lusitania in 1915 engineered event which would spark the escalation they desired. The operations of the ship Lusitania were manufactured to provoke this WW1. Winston Churchill (who also had masonic ties) had prior knowledge where every German ship in the English Channel was, due to the British intelligence breaking the German war codes in 1914. The Lusitania was told to slow and await the arrival of a military escort through the channel. Meanwhile Churchill ordered the escort to return to port leaving the Lusitania alone in a war zone. This attack was welcomed as the justification to attack Germany. This is not the first time a cold blooded and calculated application of the Hegelian Dialectic would cost thousands of lives (1,200 to be exact in this case).
Germany thought the Lusitania was carrying arms to Britain against Germany. Though this was found to be true (many decades later), the English speaking press controlled by the CFR (Counsel on Foreign Relations) and Rothschild owned news services in Europe published that the barbaric Germans had attacked an unarmed passenger ship (again not the first time that media propoganda would be used to shape popular opinion regarding war). Even though Germany had sent warnings published in New York newspapers that the ship would be sailing into a war zone.
Enter moneymaking time for the international global elite. Max and Paul Warburg, who funded both sides of WW1 along with their strong ties to the Central Rothschild owned banks. Paul Warburg's firm Kuhn, Loeb & Co. was in charge of Liberty Loans which helped finance the American Military. While Max Warburg's firm M M Warburg & Co. financed the German military. Has this been a board game to these people all along? That our lives are played out as a game of monopoly and risk?
The Rothschild's who had thus far been unable to control the Russian Czar Nicholas II were able to do so now as the European and American banking alliance was complete. Jacob Schiff spent 20 million in gold to finance the Russian Revolution through Leon Trotsky who would be exiled from New York. And of the 364 commissars which would make up the new Russian government, 264 would come from the United States. In fact as the materials and men needed for the revolution were shipped and seized at the port of Halifax by Canadian Authorities. Then president Wilson secured their release by threatening to pull out of the war.
Meanwhile Lenin who had exiled himself in Switzerland promised he would make peace with Germany if he was allowed to overthrow Russia's temporary government. He was paid 5 million in German gold and when elections were held in 1917 the communists only received 24% of the vote. Lenin leading the Russian Revolution used force to place himself in power. America stepped in with relief and food as famine gripped Russia and as Lenin took control. This paved the way for the communist agenda (again this is the ultimate Illuminati and freemason agenda all along, one world government dominated economically and socially). JD Rockefeller was a financier of this agenda as he disliked competition (the international bankers of the world want a communism, not a democracy). This built the infrastructure of Russia, and America in effect supported a communist revolution. This support continued as power was transferred from Lenin to Joseph Stalin with little regard for Stalin's ruthlessness. World War One achieved the agenda of the international bankers as communism was reliant on the support of capitalism. This was the solution they wanted all along (to the problem which was also engineered and the reaction which was controlled.)
Through the Industrial Revolution emerged Andrew Carnegie, Henry Ford, and John D Rockefeller who made his fortune off of oil production. Each of these men had a stake in the CFR formed in July of 1921 in New York. The CFR logo is a rider on a pale horse giving a masonic salute. The Latin inscription at the bottom of the logo means "everywhere". The CFR in NY is the counterpart of the Royal Institute for International Affairs in London. Both these groups are members of the Round Table established by the bankers who instituted the Federal Reserve in 1913. These were the same bankers which funded their foundations. This is the group which literally now directs entire governments, presidents, royalties all alike. The decisions which affect the world are not voted on in any kind of Democratic way, it is decided in secret by these mega rich elite who have proven their interest lies in money, no matter the cost to human lives or suffering.
James Warburg CFR member testified in 1950 to the Counsel of Foreign Relations "We shall have world government whether you like it or not, by conquest or consent." The CFR has been instrumental in dominating what will be reported on the news, and how it will be reported using reporters placed in key positions. Along with the major media streams being involved in only 6 mega corporations which control the entire media. Each of these is financed by non other the bankers behind these political and economic issues through which we are fed propaganda to shape our understanding.
After WW1 The League of Nations was the first popular attempt at creating a world government. This was a offered as a measure of security for all members since an attack on one would be considered as an attack on all. Though this failed, it allowed international bankers the chance to give more loans to more nations on the stipulation that the private bankers controlled the banking of that nation. The Bank for International Settlements was established in 1930 this provided access for the international bankers to gain more control. The Chess board is now set for World War Two.
The peace Treaty of Versailles concluding WW1 (which had caused Germany to default on its debt) was a problem easily solved by the bankers through the introduction of Adolph Hitler. Hitler used the Hegelian Dialectic principles to overtake Germany. Hitler's own men set fire to the German Parliament the Riechstag in 1933 (shown evident 75 years later.) The fire was blamed on "communist agent" Marinus Van Der Lubbe (who was in fact a mentally handicapped individual who was picked up off the street) in a highly publicized trial. (Are any of these tactics beginning to sound familiar?)
Since Germany had defaulted on its loan through the Treaty of Versailles, then US Vice President Charles Dawes plan was to replace the treaty after five years, while allowing links to be made through German and American Industry and Finance in the meantime. Hitler's war machine was thusly funded and created by Wall street. During the mid 1920 to the 1930's through the Bank of International Settlement over 135 million dollars was loaned to German electric, steel and chemical industries by international bankers such as JD Rockefeller. Why would he betray his own people? Profit. The Germans did not have technology to extract the petroleum needed to fuel their war from the coal fields, in steps JD Rockefellers oil expertise. We supplied the Germans with fuel, capital, and Dow Chemicals (an American company) contributed large stocks of magnesium to the Germans to make explosives. The same ingredients used to build weapons used against Americans during the war that killed over 400,000 American troops. Why? Profit.
Prescott Bush (yep, George H. Bush's father) was a partner in Brown Brothers Harriman. This was one of the corporations used to move assets between America and Germany.
A dialectical struggle was set as the bankers and financers created opposition with the Nazi and communist ideologies. Though they are both flawed systems, and very similar, with the same outcome. In the end the bankers chose to preserve communism instead of the Nazi's. Perhaps this was because Hitler began to print money? (This has been the nail on the coffin throughout contemporary history.)
Introducing the manufactured Hero; America, as all of Europe was now at war with itself. Which was the intention and manipulation of the bankers. America entered WW2 based on the attack of Pearl Harbor which was allowed to happen. The reports of Japan's impending attack was intercepted and relayed to then President Roosevelt who chose not to warn Pearl Harbor. This was the excuse needed to attack Germany, though Germany never attacked the US. The Japanese were ready to surrender in 1945 but instead they were dropped with two nuclear bombs. One in Hiroshima, the other in Nagasaki devastating millions of people and for no apparent justified reason.
All of the madness and devastation created opportunities for more profit by these shrewd financiers. They made money in destroying, they made money in rebuilding. Japan as it was rebuilt was used to provide cheap labor and goods for America, just as China has been doing, though there is an agenda behind this as well. At the same time communism was allowed to takeover half of Europe (USSR, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Romania and East Germany) to further reinforce an opposition between America and the Soviet Union. This entire situation, which was as manufactured as the shoes you are wearing, really allowed the bankers to clean up as well as set the stage for the introduction of the United Nations.
I should mention that Franklin Roosevelt (the one who allowed the events of Pearl Harbor) was a 32nd degree mason, Winston Churchill (who allowed the attack of the Lusitania) was also a mason, Hitler (responsbily for the genocide of 6 millions Jewish people) was deeply involved in the occult, and Stalin was a mason often portrayed with the same (masonic) hidden hand stance shown by Napoleon and Solomon Rothschild. Just like modern day gangs, there are signs and symbols for these groups.
The United Nations was the second attempt at a world government and was offered as the dialectic solution to future world wars. So as to avoid any American aversion this time, the UN was to be located on American soil by land (graciously) donated by non other than John D Rockefeller. Through the banker dominated US media the CFR had already conditioned American's to accept the increasing role of the UN. Despite our understanding of this, the organization itself was never about ushering in peace. This was about a drive toward world government.
The plight of the Jewish people was a much used tool of the Rothschild's. Arthur James Balfour expressed a desire to create Israel in the Balfour Declaration in 1917 at the will of the British masonic crown, long before WW2, which was addressed to Lord Rothschild who was the leader of the Zionist Federation. The Nazi movement anti-Semitism was used to highlight the necessity for the creation of Israel. In fact a secret pact was made through the Jewish Palestine with the Third Reich to arrange a transfer of 60,000 of their people and 100 million dollars to Palestine, the Jews would halt the worldwide anti Nazi boycott that threatened Germany economically. Since (obviously) Jewish people across the world were boycotting German goods. This terrible tragedy and crime against humanity which killed 6 million Jews, was used (like many other atrocities), by the bankers and masons to justify a specific end goal.
Lets look at another such time, another staged war with no regard to human lives lost or suffering, another cold agenda pushing toward one maniacal goal. The War of Vietnam which was about control of Asia and communism. The United States sent over 9,000,000 troops to the War of Vietnam. Remember this was the war America's youth was drafted for. It was either Canada or jail if you didn't like it. The reason we were sent there is about as muddled as the justification to send troops to Iraq and Afghanistan.
The West and capitalism was pitted against the East and communism (though in truth this was more of a symbiotic relationship than it appeared). This resulted in an arms race and this became a symbol of these increasing tensions, all the while being profited on and funded by the financiers and private bankers which held no allegiance. The level of preparation made on both sides was insane, Russia and America spent over five trillion dollars on weapons. We are taking our first look at the Military Industrial Complex.
Three more seats at the Round Table were now ready to be filled, one of which would be by the Bilderberg Group (named for the Bilderberg Hotel which was the site of the groups first contemporary meeting) founded in Holland in 1954. This group was established to benefit members, many of which had roots tracing back to masonic societies. Their goals were the formation of a European Union at the expense of sovereignty to the nations involved. Over time their membership broadened to the inclusion of NATO countries. Many CFR members are members of this group too. Once a year around 100 influential people meet to determine the fate of the world for the coming year. The level of influence we are looking at with this group is the decisions involving the worlds oil supply and determination of who is nominated for presidency. You know, nation changing influence. For instance; the recent economic crash relating to oil was a planned event by these groups.
The Club of Rome was founded in 1968 by Aurelio Pecci, outwardly they promote peace and unity but at the expense of national independence. Affiliations with the Club of Rome include the Rockefellers and the CFR. In a 1993 Club of Rome report titled "The First Global Revolution" it stated "In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill... The real enemy is humanity itself." Could this be why the E.L Rothschild bought a majority stock in the Weather Channel? Could his major investment in the worlds largest manufacturer of Aluminum be related somehow? Geoengineering which is literally creating such a scenario right now sounds quite a lot like this plan devolved by the Club of Rome in 1993. (see more about the Rothschild geoengineering connection here; http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/rothschilds-and-the-geoengineering-empire/.)
The Trilateral Commission which was created by David Rockefeller in 1973 in order to launder money. This is another chess move toward a New World Order agenda. Since the CFR and the Federal Reserve became more scrutinized in the 1950 and 1960's they were looking for ways to make their operations more covert. American and European money was sent to Japanese industries and Arab oil companies who in turn used it to buy up Western businesses and real estate. Now any Western economic problems could be blamed on the Japanese and Arabs. This created a system of Western, Eastern and Middle Eastern trade which made lots of money.
Enter Saddam Hussein as communism collapsed in 1989. A coup in 1963 led the CIA funded Ba' ath party into power, Suddam Hussein was a young member of this group. Donald Rumsfeld met Saddam Hussein in 1983, Rumsfeld gave Saddam the gas he used to kill thousands of his own people in 1988 during a Kurd genocide. This meeting was related to the fact that Suddam was pumping too much oil in order to get rid of his foreign debt. This lowered oil prices and the value of the US dollar because it was a world currency and oil was traded in US dollars. This kind of independence had to be stopped by the global elite. The war was not about some noble cause of defending freedom, it was about securing oil interests and maintaining the US dollar.
In 1990 on a visit to Iraq by American ambassador April Glaspie, Saddam asked what the US response would be if he were to invade Kuwait, she baited Saddam by replying "we have no opinion on your Arab- Arab conflicts such as your dispute with Kuwait." Suddam took that bait by invading Kuwait one month later. Operation Desert Storm followed five months later in January of 1991.
Enter the media propaganda; presented as a young Kuwaiti Nurse, "Nayirah" reported that babies were taken from incubators and left to die on the floor during Saddam's invasion. Though Saddam's troops had been defeated in a five weeks. "Nayirah" (or Nijirah Al-Sabah) was in reality a Kuwaiti ambassador for the US and Canada. Her testimony was coached by a PR firm working for the Bush administration. The babies story was manufactured by the firm for maximum emotional response. This is when (for me) it hits home. When lies are manufactured to play on the hearts and minds of humanity to wrangle them into submission or cooperation for material gains with no care to the level of suffering or deception caused, we must draw a line. It is two decades later, this war continues and we have been used. The Gulf War was based on lies to make profit and gain further control or nations, resources, and economies.
Could our trusted government and media have allowed the use of such immoral tactics? The ones we have trusted? All to benefit a massively influential international banking system and a masonic new world order agenda? Take a look at this little classic, one of many used to "sell" America on the Gulf War. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmfZkPvq9EY
Suddam's baited invasion of Kuwait meant the globalists could now hold Iraq's oil supply as ransom to the world from 1991 onwards. And as George H. Bush congratulated America on a job well done in Iraq, he dropped the real bomb on September 11, 1990 (11 years prior to another staged event) during a speech to congress. "The crisis in the Persian Gulf as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward a historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective, a New World Order can emerge. A new Era, freer from the threat of terror" George H. Bush.
Enter the historic tragedy of 9/11 in 2001. Despite the official story and the thousands of innocent lives lost; this entire event was staged in a controlled demolition. Three towers fell at near free fall speed, only two of them having been hit by what were described by multiple eyewitnesses as military not passenger planes. It only takes a moment of reviewing a picture of an American Airlines jetliner, then one look at the planes that crashed into the twin tower to see, they are not the same. This would make the north tower the second steel frame building in history to collapse due to a fire, the first was the south tower. Not to mention the fact that the first two times in history entire plane wreckages and bodies disappeared was when United 93 allegedly crashed into the hillside and the passenger plane allegedly hit the Pentagon. Leaving only one 6 foot in diameter missile sized hole which penetrated 3 layers of building and 300 feet of reinforced concrete through one of the most secure buildings in the world. No wreckage, except one turbine which did not match any model of a 747 ever made. There is inconsistency after inconsistency regarding this shameful production which cost thousands of innocent lives. I for one am insulted, absolutely insulted that they really believe we would buy this. They think that little of our intelligence? See for yourself; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-wXcJA-et0&list=WL97CA1E4BF117C0E7.
This manufactured Hegelian dialectic "attack" created the problem. Enter the media to control the reaction which was quick to blame Al-Qaeda and terrorism. Within 24 hours they had 19 names and pictures of the alleged perpetrators. Osama bin Laden trained by the CIA. He played nicely to create a negative image and to enforce a further dialectic opposition once again. What was the objective with this terrible play on the hearts and minds of the American people? Access to a hub of the worlds oil supply, opium fields, and more connections made for the new world order.
James R. Bath met George W. Bush in a bar one night during their time at the Texas Air National Guard. Both were kicked out for being AWOL. Through a trust agreement created in 1976 (see how far these links go back?) James Bath was authorized to invest money from Salem Bin Laden (Osama's father). At the same time George Bush senior was the director of the CIA. Three years later James Bath bought 25,000 shares in Arbusto 79 Limited, George Bush juniors oil company. (Didn't know Bush had an oil company? Ha! Me either. Conflict of interest rules do not apply apparently at this level of the game.) In this way Bin Laden had invested with the Bush's oil interests.
Saudi BinLaden Group makes its money as the main construction conglomerate of the House of Saud. The Saudi's make their money from supplying oil to America which creates an artificial demand for the US Dollar. (Are the pieces really connecting for you now?)
George Bush senior was a member of the Carlisle Group, a venture capital firm heavily invested in arms sales. (Again with these conflicts of interest, it sounds like both the Bush's stood to make a lot of money by perpetuating this manufactured "war".) On the morning of September 11th 2001, George Bush senior was present at a meeting held by the Carlisle Group, among others present was Shafig Bin Laden, brother of Osama.
9/11 was the bulldozer that paved the way for further war, as well as decreased freedom's for the public and more flexibility for those in power, moving America closer into the hands of the Globalist agenda. We are on the brinks of a police state world at the long dealt and masterful hand of what at this point I will generously call the puppet masters of the world. Understand that these wars are just a vehicle for an agenda to be placed into order by these maniacal people, while people are dying, movement is happening to achieve some end goal and that is the point. The past 200 years financial dominance has been achieved through the introduction of key players and concepts at opportune times.
Do you think the United States would never allow that upon its own people? Lets look at operation Northwoods, a top secret report from 1962 from the highest ranking military officer in the United States. This report was classified for 40 years and for one key reason; it outlined the method for an American military attack on America. This United States military planned to attack America in 1962, to justify invading Cuba. Among other thing's this report specified methods for such attacks and listed specifics such as sabotaging ships in the harbor, bombing military bases, starting large fires with Napthalene, holding mock funerals for victims, and destroying an unmanned drone masquerading as a commercial aircraft. The one which is perhaps most relevant was the serious military discussion over sending a modified military plane to be substituted for a civilian plane, and loaded with passengers under carefully prepared aliases. The military aircraft would than be swapped out for a drone which would be used for the actual attack. This was the one which gained the most support from Joint Chiefs of Staff.
The project for the First American Century seating members like Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush (who is looking to run for president in 2016 so be aware) and Steve Forbes just to name a few made a report in the year 2000, a year before 9/11. This group wanted to use the US Military as a vehicle of global domination. This report also stated "[this].. transformation even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic or catalysing event -- like a new Pearl Harbor." The goals of the "war on terror" match the goals of the financial elite, to make money and accelerate the next great war.
160,00 soldiers and 180,00 civilians and mercenaries are being used to fight a mere 100 Al-Qaeda members. While members of Al-Qaeda are being trained at US Military bases. We continue to catch so called "insurgents" but they always turn out to be Mi5 agents. So I ask, who are we fighting?
Where does current President of the United States Barak Obama stand on all of this? Zbigniew Brzezinski (co-founder of the Trilateral Commission) famously stated "it is easier to kill a million people, than to control a million people." Barak Obama claimed Brzezinski to be an outstanding friend who supported him in his campaign, and someone he has "learned a lot from." When Obama ran in elections one of his selling points was ending this "war." Yet two terms and three and a half years later, there are still thousands of troops in Iraq, Afghanistan and the surrounding areas. Weren't we supposed to be pulling troops out?
The recent loses to our rights were tagged onto bills written to increase our defense budget yet... who are we defending against right now? Is anyone clear on this? We lost our freedom to due trial, freedom of speech, years after losing our privacy to the "Patriot" act. Were the threat of 100 members of Al-Qaeda so affective as to continue to justify trillions of dollars in "protection" and this measure of security that robs us of the very things it claims to protect, 13 years later?
The elite controlled media did an excellent job at highlighting our "threats" at key times, when budgets needed to be increased. Then the media moves back to another extreme of completely ignoring the fact that we are still at war. They have us so befuddled about it that some of us don't even know we are still pegging away at the "war on terror" the Bush family created over 20 years ago. I will tell you one thing; in history this is one of the only wars ever fought during which people were this oblivious.
In 1973 the Club of Rome came out with a report called the "Regionalized and Adaptive Model of Global World System." It's proposal was to divide the world into ten kingdoms. This proposal is being fulfilled starting with the European Union, African Union and now reaching the US with the North American Union (of NAU.) Perhaps this doesn't sound that bad to you, in fact to be honest without knowing the history I might have felt the same. But then I recognize the parameters of enforcement which are involved and the people who would be in control of this kind of world. Understand this; the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Round Table groups, the Bush's etc., do not want peace, they want more war. They want more profit and more control, and in the end they want a New World Order under their definition and their boundaries of tyrannical rule.
If we do not begin to be critical thinkers who can see through this process, we will continue to have events like 9/11 and further wars. Look at the sarin gas attack in Syria on 1,300 children. And if this one does not make anyone else mad, than you really need to check the gauge of your emotional core. Children's lives were extinguished with nerve gas and this was set to poise the US to step in for round three of the war in the middle east, before we even finished the duties of the last two. As more details come to light, Reuters reported that the UK granted an export license to send chemicals to Syria on the eve of their Civil War. The Jerusalem Post reported Germany exported 270 tons of Sodium Fluoride, Hydrofluoric Acid, and Ammonium Hydrogen Fluoride to Syria in 2011, all ingredients used in producing Sarin. A UN official (undisclosed) reported the rebels used the gas, not the regime. Everyone took a role here it seems, and now, sadly, we know why.
Though the UN outwardly opposed intervention in Syria, it seems this was setting up for some bigger plan which the stage was set for through Russia once again. Or perhaps... could we dare hope? That enough people have finally had enough. That it was clear that this would not pass. We have had enough and people are beginning to do the right thing by refusing to continue to fight. We are not led as easily as we have been the past few decades and that is a trend which must continue in increasing conviction and quality.
We have looked at the past two centuries of history, met influential people like the Rothschild's, JD Rockefeller, the freemasons, groups of the Round Table, figured out the agenda behind the UN, the national unions and reviewed evidence about who funding the major wars, as well as who provoked them; how and why.
Still think this sounds like a conspiracy theory?
Conclusion; yes we are being controlled in every aspect by a long held and influential group of unscrupulous elite. What can we do?
History has shown revolutions can create better situations for the bankers to swoop in and capitalize, but do not always create better situations for the people. Look at the French and Russian revolutions which made the Rothschild's a lot of money, along with the other international banking vultures. Wars have resulted in the same outcome, benefiting these elite with the side effect of death, loss and further suffering to the people who wish to amend this situation.
What is the key which links every piece to every other? I have said it before, and I will say it again; Money. What can we do to remove ourselves from the necessity of this quicksand economic system? We can make money as little part of our lives as possible. We can remove the funding out from under their feet. Impossible you say? I challenge that assumption and say it is possible, it is also imperative. We can find new ways to become independent and self sustainable. We can boycott these corporations and big banks with our entire soul. We can realize that unity does not mean a one world government, it means inner peace and love for every person we share this world with. We can recognize that our power is in knowledge and that with this knowledge we are now illuminating new choices, new directions. We can chose to become critical thinkers who will not blindly offer up our trust, who will be unbound, un-bought and unafraid to ask the questions which must be asked. We can chose our own lives directions by refusing to participate in military initiatives. We can refuse to be further indoctrinated by the banker owned media. Every system has a flaw, this one's flaw is its reliance on our participation. Entropy occurs in any such system and it is happening right now in you as you realize the truth which can help us move back into freedom.
If you would like further information on ways to make a difference, please see previous articles in my archives along with associated links.
The New World Order, a 6,000 year old history.
Rothchild Family History; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WfqdcnjvlA&list=WL97CA1E4BF117C0E7